Debate over therapy of revered monk’s remains in Thai temple

Should a revered monk’s remains be accessible to their disciples, even allowing them to bodily touch the relics? Following an unsettling incident at a outstanding temple in Nakhon Pathom province, online public debate has sparked regarding the appropriateness. The controversial occasion happened whereas followers have been altering the fabric covering a mummified monk, who had left his physical form 18 years ago.
The incident gained wide attention when Parry Pairoj Wannabut, a prominent Buddhist commentator, posted her critique on Facebook concerning this disturbing episode, questioning the ethicality and respect towards a deceased trainer. Frugal reported on her feedback.
“Is it actually appropriate? Taking the mummified physique of a respected instructor, letting household and disciples contact and poke, particularly when they’re girls. Can’t we see the moral drawback here? Don’t we feel any shame once we inform others that we’re Buddhist police?”
“Preserving the physique of a respected teacher for worship, I can understand, albeit it blatantly contradicts the teachings of Buddha, specifically the contemplation of the impermanence of the physique as indicated in the Tripitaka. But if we decide to keep them, we should consider appropriateness very significantly. Respecting and honouring the bodily remnants of the monk after his demise, spreading pictures that don’t appear nice — even within the case of ordinary individuals, there are legal guidelines to protect them.”
Many comments flooded her post soon after this. The majority appeared to be expressions of agreement that monk’s stays should not be touched.
“If we are to maintain the revered monk remains as a reminder of the reality of life and demise, they need to be handled more respectfully than this. This is unbearable, what were they thinking?”
“Never saw anything like this before, only saw respectful worship.”
“I agree. The stays ought to be respected and never disturbed as soon as they’re positioned in their last resting place. Buddhist institutions and the State should prohibit such acts.”
“Are they even conscious that touching or being too close to the relics is prohibited?”

Leave a Comment